How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. X10 vs Sonic 4K 2022

EPAX X10 vs Phrozen Sonic 4K 2022

What X10 does better (4) and where Sonic 4K 2022 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

EPAX X10
EPAX · 2020X10
5.3Score
4 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
vs
Phrozen Sonic 4K 2022
Phrozen · 2020Sonic 4K 2022
5.0Score
4 advantages≈ $700
2.9Print quality4.6
7.5Build volume3.3
3.3Ease of use8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

X10Sonic 4K 2022
360 × 530380230 × 460260
X10Sonic 4K 2022Difference
Height530 mm460 mm+70 mm
Width360 mm230 mm+130 mm
Depth380 mm260 mm+120 mm
Weight23 kg14.9 kg+8.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X10 better than Sonic 4K 2022?

  1. Build volume7.3 L vs 2 L3.6×
  2. Build height (Z)250 mm vs 200 mm+25%
  3. Build depth (Y)135 mm vs 75 mm+80%
  4. Build width (X)216 mm vs 135 mm+60%

Why is Sonic 4K 2022 better than X10?

  1. LCD resolution class2K vs 4K2×
  2. XY resolution45 µm vs 35 µm+29%
  3. Weight23 kg vs 14.9 kg+54%
  4. Screen size3.5″ vs 5″+43%
Specifications

Side by side

EPAX X10EPAX X10≈ $1,2005.3
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)MSLA (LCD resin)
Delivered asFully assembled—
Build volume
Build width (X)216 mm135 mm
Build depth (Y)135 mm75 mm
Build height (Z)250 mm200 mm
Build volume7.3 L2 L
Print quality
Finest layer height0.01 mm0.01 mm
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class2K4K
XY resolution45 µm35 µm
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityEthernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-Fi—Yes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
Screen size3.5″5″
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width360 mm230 mm
Depth380 mm260 mm
Height530 mm460 mm
Weight23 kg14.9 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare