- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- XFAB 2500PD vs XFAB 3500PD
DWS XFAB 2500PD vs DWS XFAB 3500PD
What XFAB 2500PD does better (1) and where XFAB 3500PD wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
XFAB 2500PDXFAB 3500PD
| XFAB 2500PD | XFAB 3500PD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 642 mm | 880 mm | −238 mm |
| Width | 400 mm | 400 mm | = |
| Depth | 606 mm | 606 mm | = |
| Weight | 31 kg | 42 kg | −11 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XFAB 2500PD better than XFAB 3500PD?
- Weight31 kg vs 42 kg+35%
Why is XFAB 3500PD better than XFAB 2500PD?
XFAB 3500PD has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | SLA (laser resin) | SLA (laser resin) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | — | 160 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | — | 160 mm |
| Build height (Z) | — | 180 mm |
| Build volume | — | 4.6 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.01 mm | 0.01 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.1 mm | 0.1 mm |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB | Ethernet, USB |
| Ethernet | — | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 400 mm | 400 mm |
| Depth | 606 mm | 606 mm |
| Height | 642 mm | 880 mm |
| Weight | 31 kg | 42 kg |
| Rated power | 160 W | 160 W |
